What did they do ? - Muscular Mustangs
User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 04-09-2006, 09:46 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What did they do ?

I just bought a 72 Mustang with a 302 engine in it. I was looking up the Hp. on the engine and was amazed to find out that in 72 the 302 only has 140 hp, but in 71 it has 210 hp. I was wondering if anyone could tell me what they did to loose 70 hp.
DARYLLD is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 04-09-2006, 02:58 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NEPA
Posts: 2,112
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
To be honest, i know very little about the classic Mustangs, but i'd assume it has to do with emissions.



quick5pnt0 is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 04-10-2006, 07:54 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
yea, its alot of emissions...look at a vacuum diagram of a 69 302, and your 72...i think my 70 only has one vac line for the ignition advance, while the 71+ has about a hundred, and maybe a smog pump, different smog heads, and i think a less agressive cam and carb steup...
efispeedwerkes is offline  
 
post #4 of 5 Old 11-16-2006, 08:14 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ford did seem to make a mess of things in 72 (as noted in the database section) i had a 69 351w 2v in my 72 mach 1 and the performance was pretty good, i was then offered a 72 351c 4v cobra jet that i fitted and was so dissapointed it has taken a lot of polishing and porting, new flat top pistons, valves, a good cam, torker intake, heders and a 750 carb to bring it up to a performance level i am happy with, it is now much better than the 351w, but with the same work done to the windsor would it have out performed any early 70's engine? I only wish i had tried it.
MACH351 is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 06-13-2009, 07:37 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
'71 & '72 HP specs

Ford did 2 things for the 1972 model yr as far as engine specs are concerned. Compression ratios were lowered on all engines (some drastically). GM had done this already the previous yr (1971). Blame that on emissions. To top that off, in 1972 all manufacturers were required to state HP & Torque values using the SAE Net calculation (instead of the previous Gross calculation). It makes it very difficult to compare engines between the 2 yrs. Suffice to say the F code (302) suffered more than most w/ much lower compression and probably lost 30HP alone due to the SAE standard. Clear as mud???
djjsc is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Muscular Mustangs forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome